Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket Legal UK Pick polygram.ink |
0% | 100% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open on Polymarket Legal UK → |
Polymarket polymarket.com |
0% | 100% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open on Polymarket Legal UK → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open on Polymarket Legal UK → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open on Polymarket Legal UK → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open on Polymarket Legal UK → |
Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on Polymarket Legal UK.
Active sub-markets
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing | 0% Francesco Maestrelli | 100% Max Basing |
| Completed Match | 100% YES | 0% NO |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% Maestrelli | 100% Basing |
Market context
Francesco Maestrelli is scheduled to play Max Basing in Wimbledon men’s qualifying, and the market is pricing the match as an extreme longshot for a Francesco Maestrelli advance at 0% YES. The practical reading is that the current price is reflecting either very thin liquidity, a stale order book, or a strong expectation that the market will resolve away from Maestrelli rather than a literal zero chance; in tennis qualifiers, that kind of print often moves sharply on confirmed line-ups, court assignments, or an in-play retirement. Wimbledon qualifying is a standard ATP-sanctioned pathway into the main draw, and ATP head-to-head pages show the pairing as part of the official men’s professional tennis record, which matters because market settlement depends on the official outcome rather than pre-match commentary.[2][3]
Comparable cases in tennis markets usually hinge less on reputation than on whether the scheduled match is actually completed. If a match is not played, is tied, or is delayed beyond seven days without a winner, this market is designed to resolve 50-50; if play starts but does not finish, settlement turns on the event’s specific outcome rules, so withdrawals and walkovers can matter as much as straight-set scorelines. For accessibility, “no-KYC up to $1,500” means a user can typically trade up to that threshold without completing identity verification, but that does not change the underlying legal position of the contract: in Germany, the GlüStV framework is the key gambling-law reference point, while US users face potential CFTC reach if a platform or product falls within commodities-derivatives regulation.[2][3][4]
For traders, the main catalysts are the official Wimbledon order of play, any last-minute court reshuffles, and status updates from the tournament feed or live-score services once the match starts. Tennis.com and Sofascore both list the fixture for 22 June 2026, which is the cleanest confirmation to watch because a postponement, walkover, or retirement could still push settlement into the market’s special cases.[3][7]
Methodology
We track Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket Legal UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli v… on Polymarket Legal UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Trade on Polymarket Legal UK →