In this guide
The primary factor behind forecaster underperformance in prediction markets is seldom inaccurate forecasts — rather, it stems from inadequate capital allocation discipline. An astute probability assessment becomes irrelevant if a prolonged losing run exhausts your trading capital. This article outlines the methodology that safeguards against such ruin.
The Kelly Criterion: The Mathematical Foundation
Kelly Criterion establishes the theoretically ideal proportion of your capital to deploy on each market: f = (bp - q) / b
- b = net odds received (e.g., if YES costs 0.40, b = 1.5)
- p = your probability estimate
- q = 1 - p
- Result: optimal fraction of bankroll for this position
In practice: use half-Kelly. Whilst Kelly maximises expected growth under perfect information, our probability assessments contain inherent error; half-Kelly sizing delivers superior risk-adjusted performance in real-world conditions.
Hard Rules: Never Break These
- Maximum 5% of bankroll per single position — without exception, irrespective of confidence level
- Maximum 25% of bankroll in any single correlated cluster — for instance, all US election markets
- Stop-loss: if you lose 25% of your starting bankroll in a month, stop trading for the rest of the month
- Never add to a losing position to "average down" — reassess your underlying reasoning before increasing exposure
Drawdown Recovery
Inevitable periods of underperformance occur regardless of genuine forecasting skill. Following a 20% decline in capital, halve your position sizes until you rebuild to your previous peak. This approach prevents temporary adversity from escalating into account destruction.
FAQ
- How much starting capital do I need for serious prediction market trading?
- $500-1,000 furnishes adequate resources to construct a diversified portfolio spanning 10-20 positions utilising half-Kelly allocation. Below $100, position-sizing constraints prevent effective implementation of disciplined frameworks.
- What should I do after a winning streak?
- Exercise heightened caution, not reduced vigilance. Consecutive wins breed complacency and misjudgement. Maintain your disciplined allocation methodology independent of short-term results.